Roman Israel is part of a two-man law firm: he does the research and the writing, while his partner makes the court appearances. But when his partner is suddenly taken out by a heart attack, it becomes clear that the firm isn’t financially solvent, and that Roman (Denzel Washington) is ill-suited to work both sides of his cases. When a large firm comes to swallow him up, headed by George (Colin Farrell), it looks bleak for Roman’s future.
But the interesting thing about Roman is that he uses the law for social justice. He’s been working on a case for years, maybe decades, that he believes could reform the system. He is well-respected by activists and has collected clients simply by treating people like human beings. George decides to keep him around, thinking it might be good for his firm to do a little pro-bono for once. This is weird timing for Roman, who has just decided that he’s tired of working for ingrates and wouldn’t mind making a little money for once. And that’s the frame of mind he’s in when he makes a terrible, unethical, life-changing decision that could ruin or cost him his life.
There is no doubt that Denzel Washington turns in a stirring performance. Roman Israel is conflicted but he asks a lot of interesting philosophical questions. However, the performance does not make the movie. Everything else is a mess. I never fully understood what the movie was telling us: is Roman autistic? Why is he so bad with people, so out of touch, so obsessive? And it turns out that this was the least confusing part of the movie, because once it branches out from character study to mild intrigue it really spirals out of control. There’s no focus. For a film that seems poised to preach about morality, my biggest concern was whether I could write a review for a movie I walked out on.
Roman is a little too quirky and the script is a lot too unbelievable. Nothing came together for me and I was not entertained or even interested. Pass.
I’m trying to get back into blogging again, after my car accident and my mom’s funeral the day after. I am ok just sad and upset. Anyway, sorry to hear this film is not that good at all because I like Denzel..scratch that, I love this actor so I might still try this film when I get a chance
LikeLike
Well it’s not crap, it just could have been better. The best thing about it IS Denzel, so it may still be worth your while.
LikeLike
Hmmm….despite it being a mess of a movie apparently, I’m still going to watch it as I am a huge Denzel Washington fan. But am of course disappointed in finding out this movie wasn’t so good 😢
LikeLike
I was wondering how it was there was a Denzel Washington movie I hadn’t heard of, but I think your review just answered why. 😁
LikeLike
Well he got nominated for an Oscar for it, but it didn’t do much of anything at the box office. It premiered at TIFF so it was on my radar, but apparently they’ve completely recut it since then…and it still isn’t very good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
OK, pass x2, life’s too short.
LikeLike
So you are saying that the popcorn wasn’t any good either?
LikeLike
Well, to be fair, I never think popcorn’s any good.
LikeLike
So the only good thing is Denzel’s stunning performance. Too bad the movie, itself, couldn’t carry its weight 😟
LikeLike
Sometimes a good performance in a bad movie is even more frustrating because you want so badly for the movie to be worthy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aw, too bad. They can’t all be winners.
LikeLike
I know a lot of people share your thoughts on it. I have to admit I liked it quite a bit. When doing my Top 10 list it ended up in my #11-20. I don’t know many people who were quite so enthusiastic about it.
LikeLike
Hey, I’m happy for anyone who can enjoy a film that I don’t. Sitting through something you don’t like is a bad fate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You don’t need to tell me that! I sat through “Valarian”! 😜
LikeLike
Dude, me too. Still not over it.
LikeLike
Agreed and seriously,has there been a more “token” Golden Globe/Oscar nomination is recent history? This is a crappy movie that got ZERO love and yet here is Denzel getting a back handed nomination. Disgraceful….
LikeLike
Yeah, and a big greedy – last year was his year!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t think Denzel lobbied for this nomination,hell I wonder if he even promoted it much? I think it was a paycheck movie.
LikeLike
Pingback: Oscar Nominations 2018 | ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIES
That’s a shame. I like Denzel, but I haven’t liked much that he’s done the last few years. Haven’t seen Fences yet, however.
LikeLike
I think I’ll pass on this one… means that’s time I can invest in rewatching Pacific Rim before the sequel lands, innit!
LikeLike