Little Women

Writer-director Greta Gerwig has a clear feminist point of view when retelling the classic tale Little Women. She doesn’t deviate much from the novel penned by Louisa May Alcott (two novels in fact – more on that later) and doesn’t need to. Alcott was surprisingly modern unconventional for her time (1832-1888), writing about domesticity and women’s work but making it clear that they all had minds and passions and ambitions of their own, even if society was set up to constrain their use.

The novels are largely classified as autobiographical or semi-autobiographical fiction, with Jo March standing in for Alcott herself as she pulls stories from her own life to illustrate herself and her sisters transitioning from childhood to womanhood. The first novel was such a success that Alcott quickly wrote a follow up which she titled Good Wives, telling more about her characters are their lives as grown women. An avalanche of fan mail had poured in, much of it demanding a happy ending for Jo, happy meaning married of course, so Alcott wove that into her own story, but bucked against the traditional and created a second option for Jo, one she hoped would appease readers (she was, after all, needing to support her family on the earnings from her work) but would still honour the true spirit of the character she and so many others had come to love. But 150 years later, Gerwig restores Alcott’s true intentions, bending the ending just a bit, leaving it not a little ambiguous so that we may choose which of the paths was truly more important to Jo.

As a writer with 3 sisters myself, who often put on plays together in the basement (we had no attic) of our home, you can probably guess why I loved this novel from a young age. It wasn’t its radical (for the time) point of view, it was the wonderful bond of sisterhood so deeply felt within its pages. Even as the sisters fight (sometimes physically, as illustrated in the film), their attachments are secure, their love never wavering. Modern sisterhood is often portrayed as catty and competitive but we too were a home of Little Women with big personalities and are close to this day, as our Snapchat can attest.

Jo (Saoirse Ronan) is the writer, not just of their childhood productions but also evidently of this retelling. Big sister Meg (Emma Watson) is the actress, Amy (Florence Pugh) the dreamer and youngest Beth (Eliza Scanlen) the sweet, shy musician. Marmee (Laura Dern) presides over her family with unending patience and affection even as she spreads the family’s resources thin taking care of others in the community. The next door neighbours are almost as rich as they are irresistible; Mr. Laurence (Chris Cooper) cuts a sad figure from the window of his large but empty house, and young Laurie (Timothee Chalamet) clearly feels stifled as its only other occupant. Both men will get folded into the March family home in their own ways. Mr. Laurence is fond of young Beth, who reminds him of his own departed daughter, while Laurie and Jo get on like a house on fire, often to the exclusion of Amy who feels on so spurned.

The brilliance of Alcott is that even as some of these sisters settled into marriage and domesticity, the work never seems to judge them. Their paths are held in equal esteem to that of Jo’s. Alcott, who remained unmarried herself, was revolutionary in her thinking, in painting love and career in equal measure and equal worth. 151 years later, we still haven’t truly caught up, still trying to balance those wants and needs in a way that feels satisfying and right. Although I loved the spirit of this adaptation, I suppose I thought Gerwig might have a little more to say on the matter. I imagined that she might have stamped just a bit more of herself into the proceedings.

Saoirse Ronan and Florence Pugh are the stand-outs among the cast; as this is the seventh movie adaptation I suppose by now we know these are the plum roles (Jo having been played by the likes of Katharine Hepburn and Winona Ryder, and Amy by Elizabeth Taylor and Kirsten Dunst). All great directors have their muses and it seems Ronan may be that for Gerwig, playing her leading lady twice now, and likely to secure an Oscar nomination. Pugh has already had a dizzyingly successful 2019, and she certainly makes the most of her scenes in this. As Gerwig must, she trims many of the novel’s excesses, choosing scenes for plot and character development and losing many of the fun and funny anecdotal ones that make the novel feel so lively and warm. But Gerwig’s adaptation is both faithful and wise. It’s only that I admire her unique voice so much that I wish she had respected her source material a little less and allowed her own perspective to shine through a little more. If it is possible to love something while being just the tiniest bit disappointed, then that’s my verdict. Gerwig gives Little Women 100% but I unfairly hoped for 110%. Still, it’s a pleasure to see a female story be so lovingly preserved through the years, in timeless and timely ways.

18 thoughts on “Little Women

  1. Sam Simon

    Great review! I saw the movie today and thoroughly enjoyed it too! The only thing I didn’t like is the character of Laurie, I think Christian Bale did a better job in the 1994 version of the story…

    Like

    Reply
  2. selizabryangmailcom

    Hoping for 110% and getting 100% is pretty good!
    Can you imagine how I felt, after reading Interview with a Vampire, hearing they were making the movie….and casting TOM CRUISE as Lestat?
    You can’t even imagine the projectile vomit that came flying out of my mouth and how far it went.
    So…I’m happy for anyone who isn’t completely let down by beloved books that end up on the big screen.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  3. leendadll

    I never read the books and have seen, and mostly forgotten, 1.25 adaptations. This has been getting such rave reviews that I’ll add it to my rental queue (I haven’t been to a movie theater in ages… years, I think). Thx for the review!

    Like

    Reply
  4. mydangblog

    I read and and re-read this book so many times growing up, and also Little Men and Jo’s Boys, two other sequels. It’s still one of my favourites, and I’m looking forward to seeing this movie so much!

    Like

    Reply
  5. Birgit

    I am looking forward to seeing this film and am glad you enjoyed it. I say it this way because you were looking for 110%. I have not seen all 7 adaptations only the Kate Hepburn one and the one with June Allyson as Jo

    Like

    Reply
  6. Kendall

    Because I am such a fan of the 1994 version, I was afraid that I would either hate this one or have to choose between the two. Now, I love both for different reasons. Gerwig’s is darker and was a tad more difficult to follow, but is faithful to the text. I loved LOVED the casting for this movie. In fact, I am a little surprised that Amy won my heart in this movie. Usually, I just shook my head and dealt with her. Such a great movie and wonderful review!

    Like

    Reply
  7. Pingback: Little Women (2019): Movie Review

  8. StephLove

    I thought the casting was brilliant, esp. for Jo and Laurie. And I liked the way Gerwig cut up the plot and reassembled it with flashbacks that allowed her to make interesting juxtapositions.

    Like

    Reply
  9. Pingback: ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIESOscar Spotlight: Costume Design

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s