George Clooney and Julia Roberts were enough to sell this movie to me, and in the end, they were enough to save it from itself.
The truth is, Money Monster teeters between a comedy and a socio-political thriller and suffers tonally. George Clooney plays Lee Gates, a slick and smug TV show host who makes stock market recommendations in between hip hop dance moves, obnoxious hats, and lots of gimmicks. One day, live on the air, a young man (Jack O’Connell) shows up with a bomb, ready to hold him and the CEO of a certain company (Dominic West) accountable for the loss of his life savings. Julia Roberts, playing the show’s director, is stuck in the booth directing the hell out of a show that is now being broadcast worldwide to billions, while keeping her colleague (who suffers from foot in mouth disease) alive.
The problems start with Kyle, the young man who’s just lost everything. Kyle is the audience place holder. We’re not millionaire TV hosts, or billionaire CEOs. We’re the people who work hard for our money, and are subject to the whims of Wall Street. But there’s a problem with the character when he’s just not relatable – and not because he’s brought a bomb to a TV studio. In fact, I think I am more likely to start making revenge bombs than I am to ever lose everything in the stock market. You know why? Likely you do: because you never put EVERYTHING in the stock market! The stock market is NOT free money. It’s a gamble. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. And if, like me, you know very little about this mysterious money market, you have to take advice from strangers. I tend to avail myself of the type of strangers who sit behind ornate desks with gold nameplates, but I take everything they say with a margarita-rim’s worth of salt and skepticism. Kyle preferred to go with the smarmy guy on TV who has a weekly “pick of the millennium” which is kind of like trusting Judge Judy to try your murder one charge – but who am I to judge? Kyle gambled his whole kit and caboodle and lost the kitty in no time. And did Kyle get mad at himself for being so rash? Of course not! Kyle is a dumb millennial who feels entitled to everything but responsible for nothing and so Kyle goes looking for someone else to blame, and brings a bomb as his sidekick. Nice one, Kyle.
So we don’t really feel badly for Kyle, but nor do we root for Lee Gates. He’s making a fat paycheque doing his thing on TV, and it’s pretty clear he’s forgotten that his words have real-world repercussions for people with far more to lose than he does. He’s a self-involved guy who hasn’t questioned anything until a bomb strapped to his chest forced him to. Between Kyle and Lee, it’s unclear to the audience just who the protagonist is. There aren’t any characters to really invest in – and yes, I’ve been dying to make that financial pun for 500 words now.
So maybe this is why some critics are calling this movie empty\hollow\vacuous. Sean certainly felt that the film’s final moments were jarring, and maybe inappropriate. I had a different read on them though.
The movie is kind of a fun ride, with an almost real-time hostage situation, and we feel like we’re experiencing it along with the rest of the world. Imagine if this was happening in real life: you’d be glued to your TV or your tablet or your laptop or your phone. Where were you when President Kennedy was shot? When OJ fled in the Bronco? When the twin towers fell? Where were you when Lee Gates was held at gunpoint on live TV and made to account for his mistakes? Wouldn’t that be a Big Deal? But in the movie, the minute our characters hit a point of resolution, the whole world switches channels. They go back to their sandwiches and their IKEA catalogs. The immediacy with which it’s forgotten is arresting. Sean thought that was disgusting, and I thought it was brilliant social commentary.
So yes, I can understand why people are leaving this movie frustrated. But I also thought that was kind of the point.
Excellent review Jay! I suspected as much but this still really appeals to me 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad to see your review on this. Wasn’t sure whether I wanted to see this one or not. Maybe it’ll be a Redbox renter when it’s out on DVD.
Loved your financial pun. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jay,
I like movies that frustrate the viewer a bit…make them uncomfortable – not every week, but now and then. I’m curious about how Julia and George played their roles, I don’t expect they were wooden reprisals of old couplings. Did they up their dynamic?
RR
LikeLike
Their shared screen time is limited due to the circumstances, but the chemistry’s still there. George plays a real schmuck who doesn’t deserve Julia, but then, who does?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like to think I deserve Julia….
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read the synopsis, haven’t even seen it in theaters yet (not sure if I will) and the ending leaves me frustrated, great review!
LikeLike
Great review, Jay. After reading my co-blogger Keith’s review (and now yours), I’m not sure if I’d be fully committed to seeing this one in theaters. Sounds pretty interesting though!
LikeLike
Although, I like George and Julia well enough, and the movie sounds like an intriguing film, I still feel that it’s a renter film, not a theater going experience. But Jay, your review is top notch. ‘o)
LikeLiked by 1 person
It sounds like what I expected…could have been a great movie but something is lost in between. To tell the truth, I have had a few clients over the years who not only invested everything into the stock market but got into severe debt as well. I call it a gambling addiction just not the casino style.
LikeLike
I think you’re right about that. We are seduced into thinking it’s a magic way to make money but for most, it isn’t. And you shouldn’t be incautious with money you can’t afford to lose.
LikeLike
Another ‘could have been ‘ then
LikeLike
I might rent this one but apart from Jodie Foster as director, this movie doesn’t appeal to me at all. Intriguing premise though, and glad to hear it’s actually pretty decent.
LikeLike
I’m glad you reviewed this because I was on the fence about it. I think I’ll just save it for rental. Doesn’t seem worth a $15 per person movie ticket. I like Julia and George but I’m not dazzled.
LikeLike
Speaking of George Clooney, did you ever see O, Brother Where Art Thou? I love that one 🙂 Anyway, keep up the great work as always 🙂
LikeLike
Yes, actually, Sean reviewed it not long ago!
LikeLike
Yeah, I’ll skip this. It’s a kind of meh premise to me. The stock market is risky and those that don’t realize that…
LikeLike
I think you are right from your remark about this being a social commentary. It reminds me of the hostage situation; combined with health care movie, wasn’t it called, “John Q?” It also hearkens back to the days of, “Network,” which I loved how everyone throws their TVs out the window, Jay!
LikeLike
Could you imagine throwing your TV out the window? Gosh.
LikeLike
I had my doubts but will go because I can’t pass up George and Julia. I’m encouraged by your review, Jay. An interesting take.
LikeLike
I know, it really is hard to pass those two up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
SPOILER ALERT! I thought they lost their nerve by pinning the whole thing on the greed of a fictional CEO. Other than that, there’s nothing wrong with the algorithm and nothing wrong with the system.
LikeLike
I like the sound of this one. Sounds very much like a good premise, but maybe the tone isn’t quite right?
As much as there’s a lot of abhorrent practices and folk involved in the financial sectors, I’d struggle to relate to a character who gambles, loses, and pins it on a chap on the telly. So, sounds like a spot on observation on how folk react to the realisation that they’ve made a big mistake, as well as those at home watching something like that play out. I don’t think it’s too far fetched that the TVs would go off and folks would forget all about it when the ‘siege’ is over. I don’t mean everyone, of course.
Would it be fair to say that what the movie needs is Steven Seagal busting in to save the day?
Joking.
That would be great, though.
LikeLike
That would be great. Clearly you have vision, baby!
LikeLike
I clearly missed my calling in life!
LikeLike
Well just keep it in your back pocket ‘in case.’
LikeLike
Nice review. This sounded to me like something between Dog Day Afteroon and Network so I’ve been interested in it pretty much from the get go
LikeLike
It won’t live up to either of those in the history books. I think they were going for that but got a little lazy with the writing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like the stars so I’ll probably end up watching this one. I take your point about the stock market, though. It might have been easier to sympathize with Kyle had he been, say, a hardworking young guy working three part-time jobs who’d been screwed over one time too many by his bank. Of course, the writers would’ve had to work a bit harder linking someone like that to George Clooney’s character.
LikeLike
True. I did find the writing lazy in general. I didn’t how they pinned it together in the end either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Never Work With Children | ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIES