TIFF: Jackie

Jackie is a beautiful film by Pablo Larrain that focuses on Jacqueline Kennedy in the minutes and days following her husband’s assassination.

Larrain is a Chilean film maker, which makes him at outsider to American politics. He poured over documents and was fascinated to read about this day that every age-appropriate American remembers so vividly: when the car turned, the location of the grassy knoll, the flag-wavers lining the street, the bullet’s trajectory – and always sitting beside the president, his wife, Jackie. e02adc223bf38b822b3e250330bde15cLarrain thought to himself, what if it was the other way around. What if he was sitting beside her? And in that thought was born a beautifully conceived film that puts its female character front and centre.

Larrain thought the script was good but sent it back with a note to cut every and any scene that she wasn’t in. The camera would be on Jackie the whole time. Obviously a film with such unerring focus would need an actress who could carry it, and Natalie Portman is that actress. This is her best role since Black Swan and honestly it may be her best role, full stop. She inhabits Jackie like a second skin. She doesn’t get caught up in the trappings of impersonation, she just embodies the grace, the thoughtfulness, and the mystery of one of America’s most beloved and glamourous first ladies.

Despite being a favourite in the press, Jacqueline Kennedy is perhaps unknowable. She was always careful about her public persona and was closely guarded when speaking on record. The film makes this abundantly clear through scenes with a journalist (Billy Crudup) about a week after tragedy has struck. She edits her remarks, strikes things from the record, and demands final approval before a single word is printed. Noah Oppenheim’s script is 14996precise and offers up tantalizing looks behind the closed doors of Camelot.

Peter Sarsgaard, as Bobby Kennedy, is a charming lurker. Greta Gerwig in her most un-Gerwig role to date is restrained and almost unrecognizable. I’d heard that Natalie Portman gave a stellar performance in Jackie but I was unprepared for how good the film would be as a whole. This isn’t just a candidate for Best Actress but I believe, for Best Picture. It’s so well-orchestrated, each piece comes together perfectly to make a very satisfying picture. JFK, one of the world’s most recognizable politicians, is a mere shadow in this film. Jackie gets her moment in the sun, which makes Natalie Portman the star at the centre of this movie’s universe.

She deserves all the acclaim she’ll receive. She’s brave and courageous here, mixing grief and poise in an intoxicating cocktail that you won’t be able to tear your eyes from. She’s magnetic. She shimmers with loss and outrage as she protects her husband (and more importantly: his legacy) from the vultures already climbing over his coffin. Jackie feels very much like an insider’s peek-a-boo on what has to be an iconic yet little-understood moment in history. Finally we experience JFK’s assassination as Jackie felt it – as the gruesome murder of her husband and the father of her two young kids. She sat beside him, scooping his brains back into his skull, calling to him even as she knew he was already dead. His blood is still fresh on her dress as LBJ is sworn in just 43 minutes later, Kennedy’s body resting just a few feet away. What to tell the children? What to tell the nation? It’s absolutely fascinating. Stephane Fontaine’s cinematography allows us to get very close to the grief, while also appreciating its context: Air Force One, the White House, the Lincoln convertible. Jackie manages to be both historic and quite personal, and Larrain ushers us ably into both worlds. Both Portman and Larrain resist the temptation to over-emote. Like the former first lady herself, restraint, control, and self-possession are at its heart.

40 thoughts on “TIFF: Jackie

  1. Sean

    I thought it was a brilliant decision to focus only on Jackie and have JFK be no more than a ghost. Natalie Portman was amazing – I would say this was her best performance ever, which is a big deal when she’s already got an Oscar in her trophy case.


  2. Birgit

    This sounds like an excellent film and glad that she is the focus of this film. In so many films it is always about him even when they wanted to make it about her. I am looking forward to this film.


    1. Jay Post author

      It’s going to be a close one. Emma Stone took home the prize in Venice for her work in La La Land. Although I did fall completely, madly in love with that movie, I’d say acting wise, Portman has the edge. In my humble opinion.
      Not counting out Amy Adams, and there are still more performances to come!


  3. kmSalvatore

    well.. this should be interesting. as an American, (well and the rest of the world.). i remember this , all to well, sitting in my 5th grade class. i love history pieces, so im in!! thanks Jay


    1. Jay Post author

      And this is such an interesting, unseen piece of history. They weave in bits that you know, that iconic dress that she was wearing, and then take you beyond it.

      You were so little when it happened – I guess it’s not surprising that you remember, but that’s still quite the memory!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. kmSalvatore

        Not to sound like a bad American but , back then there were only 3 channels on TV and we’ll.. that’s all that was on and in the paper , and then of course in High school, it was talked about in American history . And.. every anniversary it’s all rehashed again, but I’m still going to see this, I’m always curios to see how and if things get changed around . I love history



  5. Pingback: Golden Globe Nominations | ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIES

  6. Harlon

    I totally agree with your take on this. It is an incredible performance – and I loved that it wasn’t an impersonation. I don’t think anyone could have carried this film the way Natalie Portman did – and I agree, I wasn’t expecting this, but I think this was one of the best films I’ve seen so far this year.
    I think the Best Actress category this year is going to be very competitive at the Oscars. Cheers, Harlon


  7. Pingback: Top 10 for 2016 | ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIES

  8. Pingback: Oscar Nominations 2017 | ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIES


  10. Pingback: Oscar Spotlight: Costume Design | ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIES

  11. Pingback: Top 10 Actors Who Play Assholes | ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIES

  12. Pingback: Venice Film Festival | ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIES



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s