In a way, this is exactly the kind of end-of-the-world movie I’ve been keening for. No disaster porn here, it’s quiet, contemplative; a meditation on faith and hope. Margot Robbie plays a farmer’s daughter who’s beginning to think she might just be the last woman on earth when she comes
across an exhausted scientist (Chiwetel Ejiofor) who can’t believe he’s just found the last lungful of fresh air. The two start building a life together when a third person (Chris Pine) arrives, disrupting their equilibrium.
The movie tells very little and shows even less of whatever it was that brought upon the world’s end. All we know are these few survivors and the shadows behind their eyes. You already know that Ejiofor is a fine actor, but both Robbie and Pine bring their A game as well, and this becomes a character study in the garden of Eden.
If you need action in your apocalypse, this one’s not for you. But if you like a movie that raises more questions than it answers, then you’ve probably met your match. What becomes of people when their past is wiped out and their future uncertain? And what happens to morality when no one is
looking? There’s just a touch of creepiness to all that quietness, all that wide-open space that you can’t quite trust. A concept like safety gets redefined when humanity has just been all but wiped out.
If you’re open to it, there’s a lot of religious symbolism hidden like Easter eggs in the narrative of this movie. I wrote narrative rather than plot because to be honest, not a lot happens in this movie. And as much as I loved the absence of mutated monsters, and actually appreciated the stillness, and the lush cinematography that made
it feel almost impossible that any ugliness could find their little corner of land, there was also a…dullness, something lackluster about it all, despite the finely tuned performances. I think it was a lack of commitment, as if the movie really didn’t want to make any choices at all, wasn’t confident enough to actually choose a position. I’m not usually unconformable with ambiguity, but this one tested me a bit, and it was only because the movie was quite good that I wanted for it to be great, and this weakness held it back.

Boooooooooo – had so much high hopes for this one
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve actually seen this too and I thought it was okay.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds interesting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It sounds like a near-miss, from what you’re saying. I might still watch it, but bring a book with me to the movie theater just in case. 🙂
LikeLike
Haha, weirdly,I’ve seen it done!
LikeLiked by 1 person
very good not great…that an excellent explanation of this one.
Nicely done Jay!
LikeLike
Ooh well there’s no Caleb in the book, and Ann is only 16, sounds like they’ve made a mess of it for the movie, made it into a menage a trois when it is nothing like that. Ho hum, on the miss list.
LikeLike
I look forward to seeing this one. Margot Robbie is really getting a name for herself. I remember watching her on the short-lived TV series “Pan Am” a couple of years ago. At least I think that’s what it was called. Hopefully in this new movie, she gets to keep her clothes on, unlike in “Wolf of Wall Street.”
LikeLike
She’s in overalls at that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great review with compelling analysis. I loved this movie more than most. I agree with a lot of your points. The deliberate pacing and thematic touches won’t please everyone. I really enjoyed the subtle and more internal performances. Like you said, it was refreshing to have an apocalypse that wasn’t focused on disaster, but rather the survivors. Thanks for spotlighting indie cinema.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cool complementary analysis Dan, both you and J for Jay are stroking my jellybean on this one.
RR
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is certainly one way to put it… one of the best ways ever hahaha. I hope you enjoy it (the movie, that is)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, I knew lots of people were underwhelmed, so it defied my lowered expectations and I ended up enjoying it – and particularly the performances. I didn’t realize Robbie had depth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Likewise. Robbie was a revelation… and relying on subtlety too. A most welcomed surprise.
LikeLike
Yeah, I didn’t know she had it in her!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like contemplative films about post-apocalyptic era, as most of them tend to be bombastic. Bummer this wasn’t very good but I’m still intrigued enough to rent it at some point. The cast sure is intriguing.
LikeLike
It’s worth a watch.
LikeLike
What if the problem with the movie truly is that life WOULD be dull and lackluster if that happened? I’m going to have to think about that!
LikeLike
It totally would be!
I mean, okay, maybe the fear is not dull, but being cut off from people sure is. I don’t think we’d do well with the monotony.
LikeLike
I don’t get to see “new” releases where I live. Maybe luckily for this one?
LikeLike
I read this book when I was in the sixth grade (oh, so many years ago) and it haunted me for years. I can’t imagine that the movie would be as powerful (especially as I’m now in my mid-forties, not 11). So for that reason alone, I’m out.
LikeLike
I haven’t read the book but it seems to actually be only inspired by it, not all that similar in plot, so you’d probably be disappointed if you were looking for a faithful adaptation.
LikeLike
I think I’ll still check that out. What I’m not clear on is whether or not Robbie is supposed to be playing a teenager like her character in the book was?Because she certainly doesn’t look it.
LikeLike
I tend to be introspective so I would probably find this film very interesting to watch. Thanks for the insightful review.
LikeLike
I had to view this movie three and one half times.
LikeLike