Product Placement

In Rebel Without a Cause, James Dean used an Ace Comb and suddenly every cool teenaged boy in American had to have one, which meant a huge bump in sales for the company. Product placements in movies are way more effective than traditional advertising because when placed within the context of a storyline, we become emotionally invested in the image. Plus, you won’t fast-forward through the movie like you would over a commercial.

Man of Steel made $160 million dollars before it was ever released in theatres because there were A HUNDRED products either scattered throughout the film or tied-in afterward. Did you catch them all? Nikon, Budweiser, Sears, 7-Eleven! The producers were all over free money like it was Star Jones’s wedding.

Not all product placements are so cringe-inducing. In Steven Spielberg’s E.T., ET-ReesesReese’s Pieces were actually part of the plot. In the original script, it was M&Ms Elliott used to bribe E.T., but Mars wouldn’t allow their candy in the film if they couldn’t see the final script, so Reese’s Pieces stepped up and made history. Hershey didn’t pay a cent, but they did provide the movie with 1 million dollars worth of free tie-in advertising. Worth it? They saw a 65% increase in sales during the film’s run, so I’d say yes.

The James Bond movies have always been a potpourri of product placements, from fancy-schmancy BMWs and Omega watches to elaborate vacation destinations. But Heineken trumps them all: they paid a reported $45 million dollars to be in Skyfall. And it would be worth a pretty penny to see James, MoS2 Template Masterrenowned for preferring a martini, to be caught drinking a beer. It’s a sad day when film makers are willing to forgo characterization, history, tradition, and story for the all-mighty dollar, but it’s not just one dollar, it is after all 45 million of them. How many cars can you smash up for 45 million? They destroyed about $34M worth in Spectre.

Speaking of cars, let’s segue to The Italian Job and their iconic use of the Mini 112_0305_2z+Behind_The_Scenes_The_Italian_Job_Mini_Cooper_S+Rear_Driver_Side_ViewCooper, which became the star of the movie. BMW provided 30 Minis to be used in the film and they saw a 22% rise in sales that year – not bad for a feature-length car commercial. I even rode an Italian Job roller coaster once where the cars were in fact little Minis. The movie made people reconsider the Mini Cooper – what was once thought to be a ‘girly’ car was no rebranded as sporty, speedy, and cool.

Cool is always being sold in the movies. In 1983, Ray-Ban was thinking about 28c84e9aeb151ccb947db0258be9431ccancelling their Wayfarer line when it suddenly got a big bump thanks to Tom Cruise in Risky Business. He made the sunglasses cool again, and the brand attributes the sale of 360 000 pairs to the 1042movie. So you can bet that 3 years later they were only too happy to enter into partnership with Top Gun, which this time high-lighted their Aviator line, which gave them a nice 40% increase.

There’s a battle in Hollywood for King of Product Placement: will it go to director Michael Bay, or to Adam Sandler? Michael Bay is notorious for cramming his movies full of products for sale so they look more like fast-moving catalogues that films. Adam, on the other hand, is much more frank about his brands. And that’s because, embarrassingly, the products in his movies are usually there because he loves them, not because he makes money off of them. “Sandler Marketing” is the shining beacon of product placement, because it’s not a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it can of Diet Pepsi, it’s a blatant shout-out. In Happy Gilmore, 4FVU7aFit’s actually a plot point that the golfer becomes a spokesman for his favourite sandwich shop, Subway – he’s seen eating a sub while wearing a Subway t-shirt and SHOOTING AN ENTIRE SUBWAY COMMERCIAL. It’s unclear whether Subway paid a dime for this, but that movie was also responsible for increased ratings for The Price is Right, so anything is possible.

Michael Bay, on the other hand, goes another route. You may consider that his Transformers franchise is already advertising since the series was created to sell toys. But that’s not enough anymore. Transformers #4 was nicknamed Advertising In Disguise for the sheer amount of branding jammed into its bloated corpse. The use of GM cars for all the Autobots is obvious enough, but Bay doesn’t have time for subtlety. What he does have time for: a transforming Xbox, Mountain Dew vending machine, and Nokia cellphone.

This stuff is so rampant that there’s actually an awards ceremony to pat people on the back for managing to stuff brands into movies: the Brandcameo product placement awards. Age of Extinction of course took home the trophy the year it was released (ironically it was still sued by a Chinese company for failing to include their logo), with Gone Girl a close second. Apple took home a special prize for overall product placement, having appeared in The Lego Movie, Captain America: The Winter Soldier, and in fact in 9 of the 35 highest-grossing films last year. The Theory of Everything also took home an award for marrying an Oscar-bait biopic with product placement (remember the bit about Tide? It wasn’t Tide in the original script.) These awards are always held on Oscars Eve, and this year it wasn’t Apple but Mercedes taking home the overall prize, having appeared in Furious 7, Jurassic World, Spy, 50 Shades of Grey, Focus, and Spectre. Meanwhile Apple managed a paltry Daddy’s Home, Sisters, Our Brand is Crisis, The Last Witch Hunter and The Intern. Achievement in Shameless Product Placement, a title I can’t help but love didn’t go to a movie this year, it went to a person: Mark Wahlberg. He appeared in the movie Entourage as himself, wearing a hat advertising the bottled water he’s invested in, and a t-shirt advertising his own line of body building supplements which he launched in conjunction with his body building movie, Pain and Gain. Meanwhile his other movie, Daddy’s Home, had a whole subplot about Indian motorcycle, for which he is a paid spokesperson, and which sells a “Mark Wahlberg line.”

And the Lifetime Achievement Award went to Pepsi for a veritable orgy of product placement. Last year it appeared in the likes of Tomorrowland, San Andreas, Ant-Man, and Jurassic World. It’s been in Twilight, Moneyball,  127 Hours, Fight Club, Gone in 60 Seconds, Tron, Salt, The Spice Girls Movie, Steve Jobs,  Basic Instinct, Election, American Gangster, X-Men: Days of Future Past, Snakes on a Plane, The Blindside, Twister, World War Z.  In Home Alone, it garnered a “Fuller, go easy on the Pepsi.” In Big, Tom Hanks’ man-child installed a Pepsi vending machine in his apartment. Pepsi vending machines have taken beatings in several Terminator movies. It’s also been beyond some meta-product placement, like the Doritos (owned by PepsiCo) breaking of the 4th wall in Wayne’s World, and the same basic gag being done by George Clooney in Return of the Killer Tomatoes. But are either of these half as memorable as Joe Manganiello’s stripper routine in Magic Mike’s XXL gas station scene? Didn’t think so. Touché, Pepsi. I raise my glass to you.


29 thoughts on “Product Placement

  1. Bun Karyudo

    Product placement can be a bit annoying at times. I’m almost beyond caring when it comes to James Bond movies, though. They’ve been so brazen about it for such a long time, it’s just become part of the 007 experience. 🙂


  2. Keith Noakes

    World War Z was hilarious when while being chased by zombies, Brad Pitt had to stop and get a Pepsi and slow drink it in front of the camera. It looked like they tried really hard so the logo would be showing too making it all look less natural.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. ninvoid99

    I think it depends on the film where it’s not distracting while in the case of a film like Wayne’s World it is funny. On the other hand, it can be distracting as it’s one of the reasons why I loathe both Michael Bay and Adam Sandler. It’s bad enough watching a commercial on TV or on the Internet but why do I need to watch a movie where it’s brought to you by this insipid product or that one. And it’s that kind of bullshit that has me wanting to post this:

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Christopher

    I was primed to share my favorite “product placement” moment but you beat me to it–from Return Of The Killer Tomatoes, although the clip doesn’t include the reason the director resorts to product placement. The film breaks the fourth wall with the director stopping the film because they don’t have the money to continue. He then tells everyone to be quiet because anyone who speaks on camera has to be paid. The entire crew, on camera, yells out, “Okay!”
    There’s also a final hilarious payoff to the joke.
    For one of Pierce Brosnan’s Bond films there was also a great Onion headline: “Commercial for luxury products also a spy film.”
    Back in 1990 an issue of Time also had a satirical take on product placement:,9171,154745,00.html

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Jay Post author

      The Simpsons’ fake brands are so well-known that now they’re producing them, so how’s that for reverse engineering?


  5. Wendell

    I had no idea there was an award for product placement. I’d argue Michael Bay should get one every time he releases a movie. The details of Mark Wahlberg winning are ridiculous. Again, I had no clue. A coupler that popped into my head while reading this were how The Internship was a full-on Google commercial and The Transporter was one for Audi. Good read!


  6. Jay Post author

    Black & Decker paid to have its cordless drill featured Die Hard 2 but the scene was cut in post-production. Black & Decker sued 20th Century Fox, which was the first product placement lawsuit for a film. The $150,000 claim was settled out of court.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Ben

    I have nothing against product placement if it makes sense. We are so dominated by brands and technology that it would be weirder not to do it. An awards for product placement is a great idea though.


  8. Lloyd Marken

    Great article Jay. Craig’s Bond seems like a lager man but it does change the history of the character. Interesting you mentioned The Italian Job remake. On the DVD commentary for the superior Michael Caine original, it’s mentioned that Fiat who offered the bulk of the film’s vehicles driven by the police, etc said they would give them vehicles for the good guys. The budget was tight and this could have been very helpful for the producers but who were getting no love from Mini. They kept the Coopers though to be used by the heroes. When asked they simply responded because it was about us against them. We had to use British cars. Perhaps a case where creative principals trumped easy money.


  9. Pingback: It's Only Money. - Freethinkers Anonymous

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s