Tiny Shoulders

Barbie has been a controversial figure since her inception. Before Barbie, little girls played with dolls that looked like babies. These dolls encouraged nurturing, mothering instincts. But then along came Barbie, a doll that had been “sexualized” with large breasts and hips, a distinctly adult doll that inspired little girls to dream about their own futures, to project their own aspirations.

I played with Barbies as a little girl. In fact, in a family of 4 sisters, we easily had over 100 Barbies between us. Probably over 200. Sometimes we’d get gifted 2 or 3 of the exact same, which was never a problem at all: “Twins!” we’d squeal gleefully.

Despite her figure, Barbie has always been somewhat of a feminist figure, albeit one FJF70_Viewerbased on conspicuous consumption. She held jobs that real life women were still dreaming about. She wasn’t saddled with kids. She drove her own car and owned her own home, independently, without the help of Ken, who was little more than another accessory. But no matter how many astronaut Barbies existed, she was still tall, blonde, blue-eyed, thin, with impossible, top-heavy measurements. Sleepover Barbie came with a scale permanently stuck at 110lbs and a diet book that simply said “Don’t eat.” Needless to say, real-life feminists could never quite embrace her, even as their own daughters flocked to toy stores to buy her up.

My sisters loved to play “family” but I had zero interest in play-acting motherhood. I was born this way: there was never a time when I didn’t know myself to be a childfree kind of gal. So Barbie was it for me. Barbie had the life I imagined for myself – a fabulous wardrobe, a cute convertible, a handsome boyfriend, a serious profession. The only problem was, she didn’t look a thing like me.

Tiny Shoulders, Rethinking Barbie documents the 2016 launch of a line of different-sized Barbies, FJF41_01including tall, petite, and curvy. Curvy Barbie has a thicker waist and no thigh gap. It seems like a no-brainer now, but for the people working at Mattel, it was ulcer-inducing times. Would feminists finally be appeased? Would they be derided for waiting too long? Would children embrace a “fat” Barbie, one that didn’t fit into the outfits they might already own? They were anxious to steer the narrative but were wise enough to know that social media would own them – and that a Time cover story would largely dictate her early adoption or lack thereof.

I would have embraced a thicker Barbie had she existed when I was a kid. Heck, I just checked out the catalog right now to see if the Curvy line includes one with pink hair and lots of tattoos (it doesn’t). Representations matters.

Barbie has never been just a toy. She’s an icon, with a place in our culture. Even Gloria Steinem has a thing or two to say about her in this doc. Director Andrea Nevins looks at Barbie’s reinvention from every angle, seemingly missing nothing. This is a moment in time worth documenting, and she has. And it also turns the tables on Barbie’s critics. Yes, this move was probably long overdue, but seeing things from the business side makes us realize what a gutsy move this truly was, with possible million dollar repercussions. Barbie will always have it just a little tougher than most if not all of her fellow toys just by virtue of who she is, what she represents, and what we project on to her. People are keen to find fault. Today she reflects a greater diversity – not every body, and not every ethnicity, but progress is progress – and not only is that worth applauding, I also think it deserves the careful consideration granted by Nevins and crew.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Tiny Shoulders

  1. fragglerocking

    In Britain we had Sindy, made by Pedigree Toys, a rival to Barbie who didn’t appeal to British girls. Sindy was more ‘homely’ and actually looked more like the Curvy Barbie. Sindy was bought out by Hasbro and re-modelled to look more American like Barbie and consequently died a death over here. They’re worth a fortune now of course. I had a Sindy so this post brought back my childhood, cheers Jay.

    Like

    Reply
    1. Jay Post author

      A book I really enjoyed is called Barbie and Ruth – it’s about the woman who invented her and all the shenanigans she went through. Surprising and interesting.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
  2. Liz A.

    I loved Barbie growing up. Of course she doesn’t have kids; I thought she was modeled to be something like 19 (at least originally). But she’s way overdue for a reboot.

    Like

    Reply
    1. Jay Post author

      Yes, originally she was supposed to be that age, but if she’s an astronaut…well, let’s just say that takes some time, so obviously her age is fluid. She’s a grown up. And at any rate, that’s the age at which my mother had me.

      Like

      Reply
  3. Widdershins

    I was a teddy bear kid, nary a doll in sight, so the whole ‘Barbie-volution’ passed me by. Also too poor, also I don’t know if Barbie was even in OZ when I was a kid. πŸ˜€

    Like

    Reply
  4. Carrie Rubin

    I had some Barbies, but my brother and I were only 11 months apart and played together all the time, so those Barbies interacted with GI Joes on a regular basis. Of course, they always got kidnapped and had to be rescued, but my gals were tough. They could take it. πŸ˜„

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s