Mary Poppins Returns is practically perfect in every way. It looks wonderful, whimsical, fanciful, a dreamscape. The animated sequences are next-level. The choreography is lively and polished. The costuming, by genius Sandy Powell, makes me tremble, its candy colours and hand-painted detailing an absolute riot. It’s wearable happiness.
And the cast. The cast! Ben Whishaw and Emily Mortimer play Michael and Jane Banks, the original kids from the first Mary Poppins, all grown up. Julie Walters tinkers in the kitchen as the hard-working maid, Ellen. Lin-Manuel Miranda plays Jack, the effervescent but largely ineffective lamp lighter (he might light 3 lamps total during the course of a 2 hour movie because his song and dance breaks are so frequent; the lamp lighter’s union must be fabulous). Together, they’re already a dream cast, but then director Rob Marshall plunks down Emily Blunt as the iconic nanny, Mary Poppins. Ho-lee shit. I mean, every ounce of credit to Julie Andrews, but since she’s vacated the seat, Emily Blunt is absolutely the perfect choice to carry the carpet bag. Anyone else in the role is simply unimaginable. And Colin Firth and Meryl Streep are BONUSES? Ex-squeeze me? Pure casting heaven.
But here’s the deal: despite there not being a single smudge dirtying up the glass, the magic just wasn’t there for me. I wanted to love this movie. Maybe I wanted it too much. It has all the right ingredients, but the pinch of disappointment is all I can taste.
Michael Banks is in a spot of trouble. His wife died a year ago, leaving him in charge of the house and the kids. All are neglected. His adorable children aren’t just raising themselves, they’re taking care of him too. Just about the only thing they can’t do is save the house from foreclosure. Michael and Jane can’t do it either – neither has any money. Where or where are those stock certificates their father left them? They’ve only got a few days to save their family home from the evil banker, Colin Firth. Cue Mary Poppins. Nominally, she’s taking care of the children, but I think her main ambition is just to allow them to be children again. And ideally, force Michael to act like the father again. So that’s the plot, and then we continually interrupt the plot to do some wild Mary Poppins shenanigans. The dancy, singy, cartoony musical numbers are incredible, or they would be if the songs weren’t so negligible, but they grind the plot to a halt and don’t relate to the rest of the movie at all. It’s not cohesive; I feel like I was watching two different movies, part depression-era family tragedy, part nostalgic stuff and nonsense. There are some wonderful call-backs to the original film, but I feel like Mary Poppins returns relies too heavily on its predecessor and our forgiveness. I wanted so badly to be carried away by this, but I remained firmly in my seat, butt against leather, popcorn in the cracks (of the recliner, not my ass). Translation: perfectly ordinary in every way.
Yeah,I’m not the biggest Emily Blunt fan…..and while she may look like Mary,she doesn’t have have heart and soul of Julie Andrews. She comes across as more as Jadis then Mary Poppins.
Thanks for an HONEST review……
LikeLiked by 1 person
How disappointing. I was looking for `a holiday movie to watch.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Forget sloughing off, lonelyauthor, watching holiday movies and put your nose to the grindstone and produce your poetry!
Poems don’t grow on trees you know! Bah Humbug . . .
LikeLiked by 3 people
LOL
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m not sure if I’ll see this in theaters but I probably will watch on it DVD eventually. It doesn’t seem like it’s going to have an iconic song like the original had more than one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, too bad. I was hoping this would be fantastic. But it is getting mixed reviews.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was hoping that too. I really FELT that I was going to love it.
LikeLike
There is ONLY ONE Marry Poppins and that is Julie Andrews! You can’t go home again EVEN with special effects!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sadly, I have heard only bad things about this movie. I really want to like it and am still excited to see it, but I am taking it with a grain of salt.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love the cast (and Emily Blunt is a great choice for this role) but I’ll probably wait for DVD on this one. Even the previews were just… okay. Add to the mix reviews and feels like a bit of a let down.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ack, that’s too bad. I realized, while reading your review, that I was harbouring Very High Hopes for this film, so I’ll adjust those a little.
Also: Happy Holidays to you, and best wishes for 2019!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, I realized that too, walking out. I couldn’t really point to anything wrong, just that there was an absence of wow.
And if you’re going to touch a class, you better bring the wow. Justify yourself!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aahh and I was so looking forward to seeing it. Saw the promo before we watched Bumblebee today.
LikeLiked by 2 people
How did you like Bumblebee?
LikeLike
The battle scenes were a little prolonged. Not the best as previous BUT my son is not going to be this age always, so pleased him. I would rather have gone to see Bohemian Rhapsody but i wont tell my son that.
LikeLike
noooooooooo this review took the most unpleasant and unexpected turn after it began with “Mary Poppins Returns is practically perfect in every way.” No fault of yours, of course, Jay, I just really wanted to love this too and am sad that it looks like I probably won’t as much as I hoped. Ah well, good to temper my expectations before seeing it so I won’t be as disappointed while watching, I suppose.
LikeLiked by 1 person
not super
calafragalistic
expialadoious?
oh well 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I absolutely loved it I have to say. It was magical but I haven’t seen the original.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think Mary Poppins returns is cohesive. There is a clear story arc running through it and I don’t think the musical numbers interrupted the plot. I think with any musical you have to allow a slight surge into a different direction, before recomposure and picking up the plotline again. I really enjoyed it!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hey Jay, I’m so sorry you didn’t enjoy this one as much as our family. Being one who loves the original I thought everyone here did a fabulous job of living up to expectations. It’s not the original, but it’s damn close. Anyway, I didn’t think it was all that bad as a follow-up, and my wife (the ultimate film critic—hates this kind of fluff) adored it. Go figure! Can’t get the tunes outta my head. Only complaint…Julie didn’t sneak in there somewhere. Other than that, our family and their kids all enjoyed it. All the same, nice review. Oh, and Jay, HAPPY NEW YEARS! 😀
LikeLike
Yes, Ms. Andrews said she felt she’d be too much of a distraction and she really wanted Emily to be able to fully own the role, and I do kind of get that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wonder if you really need to be a kid or go with akid to get the most out of it; like many of the comments in review and above I could not outright critise, but I was not wowed.
LikeLike
Maybe it helped a little to have children in-toe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So you enjoyed avec kids?
LikeLike
Yeah, and all our kids had a great time. :O)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I feel mostly the same, but I think I enjoyed it just a little more. I just reviewed the movie today in case you’d like to read it: https://mastermixmovies.wordpress.com/2019/01/02/practically-perfect-in-every-way/
LikeLike
Pingback: ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIESDisney’s Magic Kingdom
Pingback: ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIESThe Lion King (1994)
Pingback: ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIESOscar Spotlight: Costume Design
Pingback: ASSHOLES WATCHING MOVIESThe Craft